
发布时间:2024-09-18
这些额外的压力可能抵消了向上流动带来的积极影响。
此外,社会流动性对幸福感的影响还存在性别差异。研究表明,女性在向上流动时可能面临更大的挑战,包羅性别歧视和工作与家庭均衡的问题。

社会科学研究中經常面临地位不一致情况下的效应分化问题,此中社会流动效应的估计最为学界所关注。
利用模子推导、模拟数据和现实数据闡明,本文指出流动对照模子对传统方式的批评在理论和方式上都存在较大误区。| 英文标题: | The Effect of Social Mobility and Its Extensions: Methodological Developments,Debates and Critiques |
| 摘要: | |
| 作者: | 王鹏 |
| 作者单位: | 复旦大学社会学系 |
| 期刊: | |
| 年.期:页码 | 2024.3: |
| 中图分类号: | |
| 文章编号: | |
| 关键词: | 社会流动;流动效应;对角线参照模子;流动对照模子 |
| 英文关键词: | |
| 项目基金: | |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第4187位读者! | |
Social science studies often encounter the challenge of decomposing effects in the presence of status inconsistency, with a particular focus on estimating the effects of social mobility. This paper systematically compares different methods in terms of theoretical assumptions and model specifications by reviewing key debates and recent developments pertaining to the estimation of social mobility effects. Specifically, it compares the widely used Diagonal Reference Model with the recently introduced Mobility Contrast Model. Through model derivation and the analysis of conducted on simulated and real data, this paper points out that the criticisms of the Mobility Contrast Model against traditional methods contain significant misconceptions in theories and methods. Based on this, this paper provides specific approaches to choosing appropriate methods according to theoretical and realistic contexts. It also summarizes the guiding principles and considerations that should be taken into account when applying these methods.


